I may have posted this before. I got this e-mail in circa 1998, and I still consider it to be the best one I ever got:

A retiring pChem (Physical Chemistry) professor was composing his last exam for a graduate course in statistical thermodynamics. Being a bit bored, and with a well kept and wry sense of humor, he set a single question on the sheet:

"Is Hell endothermic or exothermic? Support your answer with a proof."

He had little idea what to expect, or how to grade the results, but decided to reward any student who was able to come up with a reasonable and consistent reply to this query.

One "A" was awarded.

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law or some variant. The top student, however, wrote the following:

"First, we postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion on average, we can predict that all people and all souls go to hell on average. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Thus, there are two possible conditions:

1. ) If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, than the temperature and pressure in hell will increase exponentially until all hell breaks loose.

-OR-

2. ) If hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.

We can solve this (de)lemma with the 1990 postulation of Ms. Theresa LeClair, the woman who lived across the hall from me in first year residence. Since I have still not been successful in obtaining sexual relations with her, I know that condition two has not been met, and thus it can be concluded that condition one is true, and therefore that hell is exothermic."

Good joke, but you messed up a bit on the delivery, at the end it's supposed to say:

"Ms. Theresa leClair, the woman who lived across the hall from me in first year residence, who said that I would not sleep with her until "Hell freezes over"" and then continued on, otherwise the joke just doesn't work.

Well thanks for helping fix the problem.

I saw the same thing except it was

According to Theresa's statement that 'hell will freeze over before I sleep with you' and the fact that I slept with her last night, hell must be exothermic.

Great joke though.. I loved it.

wouldn't that mean hell would be endothermic? Cause if he slept with her hell would be frozen.

yea, you are right Demosthenes, but i did get the joke without your addition in the first reply, so it's not THAT important

well it gets inferred after the fact, but i mean there are other replies like "when pigs fly" etc.


I dunno, it just adds to it though. It's semi-important.

However you right it, the first time I read this joke I laughed out loud... it still draws a chuckle.

yeah, i recognized it and still went ahead and read it...